Bob Mackey ([info]bobservo) wrote,
@ 2006-03-26 11:56:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:jambar

my beef with the church
Image Hosted by ImageShack.usFor Catholics during the Lenten season, it’s tradition to avoid eating red meat on Fridays and specific holy days as an act of humility. Stews, burgers, and the odd turducken are abstained from, and fried fish – at reduced prices - is downed in large quantities to show personal sacrifice, and the fact that Western religions make “fasting” into a gut-busting hedonistic party. Basket upon oily basket of cod was not enough for one Atlanta congregation, though, as St. Patrick’s Day fell on a Friday this year, and parishioners demanded their corn beef, damnation or no. Phone calls were made. Excommunication was considered. Finally, one archbishop made an appeal to God that probably went something like, “Snakes? Ireland? Green beer? Come on, big guy!” and Biblical law was stretched so the faithful could enjoy hot, pink, dripping beef.

This isn’t the first time the word of God was stretched so a bunch of whiners could have their way. Recently, the Church has done away with Limbo, the fun time good place where unbaptized babies go when they die. For a while people were kept sedated with the rationale of, “Well, Limbo is baby exclusive, so it’s not like I’ll be hanging out there.” As time passed, the spookiness of a floating baby dimension creeped people out enough to take action, but I think completely in eliminating limbo, the Church went a little too far. I’ve always had the idea of a theoretical chute that the babies can use to enter Heaven. After all, Limbo was made up, so why can’t the Church do a little imaginary renovating?

It’s this proof of the malleability of Biblical law that has inspired me to create my own lists of requested reinterpretations and favors. I expect response by mail and/or miracle, and in the case of the latter something cool like a train explosion in the shape of a thumbs-up.

  • Can you possibly make the Eucharist more filling? Symbolism is great and everything, but it’s no excuse for a balanced meal. When I attended Church, I often thought of getting in line twice for communion, but was too afraid of the reprisal I would face for getting double-salvation. Along with bigger portions, might I also recommend flavors? Creative names like “Cool Ranch Christ” and “Jalapeno Jesus” will land you new members of the T.G.I. Friday’s crowd.

  • Premarital Sex. Don’t you think you’re being a bit of a buzzkill here? You may call it “adultery,” but I call it “something to do after drinking when you try to forget.” Would you rather have me driving around after I get drunk, possibly going to abortion clinics along the way and giving them my support? In a world of instant Heaven for babies, it’s only fair that they should suffer on Earth for about 80 years just like us.

  • I bought this awesome golden statue of a false idol at a garage sale for 80 bucks, and I can’t not worship it! What about if I just did it on Tuesdays?

  • Since the Church is in charge of miracles in this country, how about getting rid of all known diseases? Alright, you don't have to get rid of all of them, just the ones I might get. I’m so terrified of prostate cancer that I would do something unthinkably awful - like converting to Scientology - if I was promised safety. On this same subject, could you also make it so no more babies are born inside-out? It’s beginning to make people question the existence of God.

  • Please disassociate yourself with Christian Rock. It’s making you look bad.

  • It would be a good idea if you made listening to Kirk Cameron a sin. He may have defined our generation as the Holden Caulfield of the 80s on the sitcom, “Growing Pains,” but his massive head, as well as creepy confrontational Christianity has let me know what it sounds like when a nation shakes its head “no” in unison. As a motivator, you could also give out 50 dollars in Heaven Funbucks – to be spent in the afterlife – if we strike him.

  • I know there’ve been a lot of arguments between Creationists and Evolutionists. If you can’t agree that mankind has descended from apes, can’t you compromise and agree that we came from a cooler animal, like a raccoon? I sure would like a genetic excuse for my tree-climbing and garbage-eating. Also rabies.

  • Could the Church possibly get a new mascot? I know the crucifix has been tradition, but the image of a guy nailed to something doesn’t exactly scream, “Come on in!” If aliens landed on this planet and judged a Church based on this symbol, they wouldn’t think it was a place of salvation. They would think it was a place where guys are nailed to things, causing them to vaporize our race for being barbarians. I recommend something like the San Diego Chicken.

    I know I’ve strayed from the flock, but you guys have been waffling so much that I figure now is as good a time as any to jump back in. And if you don’t think I’m worth it, just remember that Christianity needs jerks to make fun of things, too. Don’t you want me on your side?



(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]billiambl
2006-03-28 05:36 pm UTC (link)
New hatemail for you today, buddy!

-----
My Beef with Bob Mackey

Your suggestion in last Thursday’s Jambar of creating Dorito flavored Eucharist, such as “Cool Ranch Christ” and “Jalepeno Jesus” was most appalling. Holy Eucharist is a way for Christians to remember what Jesus did for them and to give thanks. The presence of Christ is more than fulfilling for Catholics. We don’t need heaving portions or extra flavoring.

You seem to confuse the concepts of church teaching and biblical law. You claim that “biblical law was stretched so the faithful could enjoy hot, pink, dripping beef” on St. Patrick’s Day. Where does the bible forbid eating meat on Fridays? Abstaining from meat on Fridays during lent is a church teaching, not biblical law. Therefore, if the church decides that their teaching should be modified to celebrate a religious holiday, they have the right to do it. If you are not a practicing member of the church, the decision doesn’t affect you and you shouldn’t be concerned about it.

Likewise, referring to lent as “a gut-busting hedonistic party” is most offensive to people who celebrate the season of lent. Lent is a time of intense preparation for Easter. We make personal sacrifices through prayer, fasting, and almsgiving. I don’t think that you have the right to judge the success or the sincerity of our Lenten sacrifices.

How could the San Diego chicken possibly be a more welcoming “mascot” than the crucifix? The crucifix is a reminder of Christ’s sacrifice and love for us. If you don’t think that the crucifix has enough meaning, you don’t have to belong to the Church. I think most people would reject the idea of replacing Christ with a chicken.

I was very disappointed in your article. You attacked important beliefs and traditions, without trying to discuss them intelligently. Some of it didn’t even make any sense. You described premarital sex as “something to do after drinking when you try to forget”. You then asked, “Would you rather have me driving around after I get drunk, possibly going to abortion clinics along the way and giving them my support?” Aside from the fact that drunk driving is illegal and dangerous, no one is preventing you from doing these things. How are they related and why should I have to pick which behavior I would rather have you do? Just because you don’t agree with Catholicism doesn’t mean that you should write intolerant articles against it.

Nicole Mcelroy.

(Reply to this)


[info]billiambl
2006-03-28 05:43 pm UTC (link)
I facebooked the girl and realized she lives in Cafaro with me. She's catholic and I saw her once going to a Campus Crusade for Christ meeting with her boyfriend. oOooooOoooOoO

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bobservo
2006-03-29 04:06 am UTC (link)
Looked at a picture- she does not pass The Mackey Challenge(tm)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]glassofguinness
2006-04-05 02:47 am UTC (link)
ohhhhhhhhh ok, that makes much more sense now :)

in the letter to the editor, the person writes, "Now we know the ramification of belittling a revered figure such as Mohammad in the press."

besides spelling his name wrong, he fails to acknowledge the general truth that the behavior of the those (violently) protesting the publishing of these cartoons is wholly inappropriate and hilariously ironic; therefore, he's choosing to roll over just so as to no offend anyone of the muslim faith.

let's expound upon that: i think you should launch a vicious literary attack against this guy; in the end he's clearly going to cave. unless he doesn't ascribe you the importance he does these wonderful religions, which is probably true. so be it, he's still a coward.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]glassofguinness
2006-04-05 02:49 am UTC (link)
ps i've read a few of your articles and it's ones like these i find are the strongest. the sillier ones are the ones i don't care for, but they definitely have their place as well.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bobservo
2006-04-05 03:32 am UTC (link)
"let's expound upon that: i think you should launch a vicious literary attack against this guy; in the end he's clearly going to cave. unless he doesn't ascribe you the importance he does these wonderful religions, which is probably true. so be it, he's still a coward."

This is what Thursday's article is going to be about. I think I covered all the bases.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]glassofguinness
2006-04-05 03:05 am UTC (link)
sorry to be flooding you with comments here tonight, but there's something else i thought of.

what you describe as waffling is actually, imo, not necessarily a bad thing.

think of it this way: instead of rigidly applying the rules of faith (including the potential horrid consequences of applying the rules thusly, as we often see in other more hard-lined faiths), the Church is saying "well, when it comes right down to it, this is not an issue of life or death," literally. by bending the rules in situations such as these, i think the Church is showing that faith and tradition don't always trump progressive (sometimes more realistic) tendencies and practices.

so in the end, by caving on small issues like these, the Church can continue to focus on what's really important: bringing people, and of course their wallets, to their faith and continuing to grow the base of support that the Church has, instead of nitpicking over stupid little rules.

it's when they start to compromise too much and on more important (judgement call on this one) issues that we have problems. see also: pardoning, in effect, all the little molesters who were outed a few years back. that is unacceptable, and is definitely reason enough for any practicing Catholic (myself included) to reconsider aligning themselves with an institution who'd condone this kind of behavior.

cheers!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bobservo
2006-04-05 03:36 am UTC (link)
I don't think that the Church waffling is a bad idea, since I'm an atheist and it lets people eat what they want; I'm all about personal freedom. This article really wasn't meant as an attack on Catholicism. It's more like the view of religion I had in childhood updated for my adult life.

I still think it's pretty hilarious how the church can just "get rid of" Limbo, though.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…